202 in current implementation
Yves Lafon <[email protected]> Thu, 30 Mar 2006 18:26:25 +0200 (MEST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.distributed |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dave, As you mentionned that you know implementations using 202, do you know what is their behaviour when there is an unmet mustUnderstand? (sending back the mU fault instead of a 202, or is it completely hidden) Also, do all implementations you know do the same? Thanks, -- Yves Lafon - W3C "Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras."