ROR proposal issue #2 (aka SC2)

I took an action to explode the substantive comments on the ROR 
proposal individually out to the ML. This is one of three.

Thx, Mike 

----------------------------------------------------------------
Issue: Do not make any claims as to what the response message 
indicates (whether or not the message was received). 

Target: 6.2.2

Commenters: Chris Ferris (CF), Dave Orchard (DO)

Proposed text: 
From: '***The SOAP Request-Response MEP defines a pattern for the 
exchange of a SOAP message acting as a request followed by a message 
acting as a response. The response message MAY contain a SOAP 
envelope, or else the response MUST be a binding-specific message 
indicating that the request has been received. In the absence of 
failure in the underlying protocol, this MEP consists of exactly 
two messages.'

To (1): '***The SOAP Request-Response MEP defines a pattern for the 
exchange of a SOAP message acting as a request followed by a message 
acting as a response. The response message is a binding-specific 
response that MAY contain a SOAP envelope. In the absence of failure 
in the underlying protocol, this MEP consists of exactly two messages.'
(CF)

To (2): '***The SOAP Request-Response MEP defines a pattern for the 
exchange of a message acting as a request optionally followed by a 
message acting as a response. The messages may or may not carry SOAP 
envelopes. In the absence of failure in the underlying protocol, this 
MEP consists of one request message and one optional response 
message:' (DO)


Refs: 
(1) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2006Jan/0062.html
(2) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2006Jan/0092.html