Re: ROR proposal issue #3 (aka SC3)

On 4/5/06, Christopher B Ferris <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> After we discussed this issue on the call today, it became clear that I may
> have been
> mis-reading 'response message' for 'response envelope'.
>
> DaveO and I were discussing our respective positions on this and I believe
> that we are
> in agreement that the reference to "other information structures" includes
> things like the
> HTTP status code and other goop.

Bravo, Chris.

If you recall, we referred to that as the "chameleon view" of SOAP;

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2001Oct/0263.html

Mark.
--
Mark Baker.  Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.       http://www.markbaker.ca