Re: [NEW ISSUE] namespace name for MTOM policy assertion

Christopher B Ferris <[email protected]> Wed, 21 Feb 2007 07:32:04 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.text.xml.distributed
Message-ID <OF856E0D14.0F2151E9-ON85257289.0043B447-85257289.0044DAED@us.ibm.com>
I added this to Bugzilla:

        http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4340

Cheers,

Christopher Ferris
STSM, Software Group Standards Strategy
email: [email protected]
blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/chrisferris
phone: +1 508 377 9295

[email protected] wrote on 02/20/2007 08:27:54 AM:

> 
> All, 
> 
> It would help if all issues raised against the MTOM policy spec [1] 
> follow this format. 
> 
> Title: namespace name for MTOM policy assertion 
> 
> Description: We need a namespace name for MTOM policy assertion. The
> W3C is moving towards a new scheme 
> for assigning namespaces that take the form: http://www.w3.
> org/ns/[shortname]. This issue serves as a placeholder for 
> choosing the final namespace for this assertion. 
> 
> Justification: We need a w3c assigned namespace. 
> 
> Type: editorial 
> 
> Proposal:  http://www.w3.org/ns/soap12-mtom-policy 
> 
> Note that I am proposing that the shortname be a follow-on to the 
> MTOM REC shortname, simply adding '-policy'. 
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/REC-soap12-mtom-20050125/ 
> 
> Cheers, 
> 
> Christopher Ferris
> STSM, Software Group Standards Strategy
> email: [email protected]
> blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/chrisferris
> phone: +1 508 377 9295