Re: Checked in soap 1.2 part 3
David Hull <[email protected]> Thu, 03 May 2007 15:50:04 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.distributed |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------050902010008010504050507
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
David Orchard wrote:
> But I note 2 things:
> 1) The error handling section seems somewhat redundant with the text in
> 2.2.
> 2) The error handling section says "or the receiving SOAP node", should
> it say "or any receiving SOAP node(s)"?
I propose removing the last paragraph of 2.2 and replacing the existing
2.4 with it. 2.4 would then read, in its entirety:
Each SOAP node involved in the message exchange makes its own
determination of the successful completion of the message exchange.
Each node MAY independently signal a fault in the case of abnormal
operation. Determination of abnormal operation is outside the scope
of this specification. Disposition of such faults is outside the
scope of this MEP.
Since we're here ... Is there any particular reason we say determination
it outside the scope of the spec, but disposition is outside the scope
of the MEP? If not, we could merge the last two sentences, giving:
Each SOAP node involved in the message exchange makes its own
determination of successful completion of the message exchange. Each
node MAY independently signal a fault in the case of abnormal
operation. Determination of successful operation and disposition of
faults are outside the scope of this specification.
(I've also changed "determination of abnormal operation" to
"determination of successful operation" for consistency. I'd also be
fine with having "abnormal" in both places. Or "successful or abnormal"
in both places. Or ...
--------------050902010008010504050507
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
David Orchard wrote:<br>
<blockquote
cite="midE16EB59B8AEDF445B644617E3C1B3C9C03A8B61D@repbex01.amer.bea.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">But I note 2 things:
1) The error handling section seems somewhat redundant with the text in
2.2.
2) The error handling section says "or the receiving SOAP node", should
it say "or any receiving SOAP node(s)"?</pre>
</blockquote>
I propose removing the last paragraph of 2.2 and replacing the existing
2.4 with it. 2.4 would then read, in its entirety:<br>
<blockquote>Each SOAP node involved in the message exchange makes its
own
determination of the successful completion of the message exchange.
Each node MAY independently signal a fault in the case of abnormal
operation. Determination of abnormal operation is outside the scope of
this specification. Disposition of such faults is outside the scope of
this MEP. <br>
</blockquote>
Since we're here ... Is there any particular reason we say
determination it outside the scope of the spec, but disposition is
outside the scope of the MEP? If not, we could merge the last two
sentences, giving:<br>
<blockquote>Each SOAP node involved in the message exchange makes its
own
determination of successful completion of the message exchange.
Each node MAY independently signal a fault in the case of abnormal
operation. Determination of successful operation and disposition of
faults are outside the scope of
this specification. <br>
</blockquote>
(I've also changed "determination of abnormal operation" to
"determination of successful operation" for consistency. I'd also be
fine with having "abnormal" in both places. Or "successful or
abnormal" in both places. Or ...<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>
--------------050902010008010504050507--