RE: Checked in soap 1.2 part 3

"David Orchard" <[email protected]> Mon, 7 May 2007 10:25:09 -0700
Newsgroups gmane.text.xml.distributed
Message-ID <[email protected]>
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C790CC.C6FC7C16
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I started with the XML version that is in CVS and that I've been editing
all along.  Providing HTML doesn't help much.  I saw your HTML version
and mentioned it in my message.
=20
Cheers,
Dave


________________________________

	From: David Hull [mailto:[email protected]]=20
	Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2007 11:27 AM
	To: David Orchard
	Cc: [email protected]
	Subject: Re: Checked in soap 1.2 part 3
=09
=09
	I'm a bit confused here.  I had sent out this version
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2007Apr/0010.html> ,
per the decisions made on the last couple of telecons, which I was going
to get Yves' s assistance in checking in.  Is that the version you
started with?
=09
	David Orchard wrote:=20

		Apologies for the delay, I did a bunch of changes on
0425 and then
		forgot to check them in.  I checked in soap 1.2 part 3
with the changes
		as best I understood them.
=09
http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/6/soap12-part3-20070425.html is the
		dated version.
	=09
		It was very difficult to follow the minutes FWIW.  I saw
that David Hull
		had proposed an HTML version, and I checked the
generated HTML against
		that.  There were changes for the error handling that I
then included. =20
	=09
		In addition to the WSDL WG's comments, I removed the ed
note about
		soliciting feedback. =20
	=09
		But I note 2 things:
		1) The error handling section seems somewhat redundant
with the text in
		2.2. =20
		2) The error handling section says "or the receiving
SOAP node", should
		it say "or any receiving SOAP node(s)"?
	=09
		Cheers,
		Dave
	=09
		 =20



------_=_NextPart_001_01C790CC.C6FC7C16
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE></TITLE>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dus-ascii">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.6000.16414" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY text=3D#000000 bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft><SPAN class=3D890512217-07052007><FONT =
face=3DArial=20
color=3D#0000ff size=3D2>I started with the XML version that is in CVS =
and that I've=20
been editing all along.&nbsp; Providing HTML doesn't help much.&nbsp; I =
saw your=20
HTML version and mentioned it in my message.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft><SPAN class=3D890512217-07052007><FONT =
face=3DArial=20
color=3D#0000ff size=3D2></FONT></SPAN>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft><SPAN class=3D890512217-07052007><FONT =
face=3DArial=20
color=3D#0000ff size=3D2>Cheers,</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft><SPAN class=3D890512217-07052007><FONT =
face=3DArial=20
color=3D#0000ff size=3D2>Dave</FONT></SPAN></DIV><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px =
solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV class=3DOutlookMessageHeader lang=3Den-us dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft>
  <HR tabIndex=3D-1>
  <FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2><B>From:</B> David Hull =
[mailto:[email protected]]=20
  <BR><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, May 03, 2007 11:27 AM<BR><B>To:</B> David=20
  Orchard<BR><B>Cc:</B> [email protected]<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: =
Checked in=20
  soap 1.2 part 3<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
  <DIV></DIV>I'm a bit confused here.&nbsp; I had sent out <A=20
  =
href=3D"http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2007Apr/0010.htm=
l">this=20
  version</A>, per the decisions made on the last couple of telecons, =
which I=20
  was going to get Yves' s assistance in checking in.&nbsp; Is that the =
version=20
  you started with?<BR><BR>David Orchard wrote:=20
  <BLOCKQUOTE=20
  =
cite=3DmidE16EB59B8AEDF445B644617E3C1B3C9C03A8B61D@repbex01.amer.bea.com =

  type=3D"cite"><PRE wrap=3D"">Apologies for the delay, I did a bunch of =
changes on 0425 and then
forgot to check them in.  I checked in soap 1.2 part 3 with the changes
as best I understood them.
<A class=3Dmoz-txt-link-freetext =
href=3D"http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/6/soap12-part3-20070425.html">htt=
p://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/6/soap12-part3-20070425.html</A> is the
dated version.

It was very difficult to follow the minutes FWIW.  I saw that David Hull
had proposed an HTML version, and I checked the generated HTML against
that.  There were changes for the error handling that I then included. =20

In addition to the WSDL WG's comments, I removed the ed note about
soliciting feedback. =20

But I note 2 things:
1) The error handling section seems somewhat redundant with the text in
2.2. =20
2) The error handling section says "or the receiving SOAP node", should
it say "or any receiving SOAP node(s)"?

Cheers,
Dave

  </PRE></BLOCKQUOTE><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

------_=_NextPart_001_01C790CC.C6FC7C16--