RE: Checked in soap 1.2 part 3

David Orchar writes:

> We did your first 2 comments,

OK

> we think the 3rd one is overtaken by events

OK

> and we had a recollection that we'd have one table given that
> the table is simpler than before. 

I'm not personally convinced, but it's not a big deal either way, and I 
think those of you who remain in the workgroup should do whatever seems 
best to you.  In any case, I am just fine with the resolutions of my 
issues as you have proposed.  Thank you for getting back to me. 

Noah

--------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn 
IBM Corporation
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
1-617-693-4036
--------------------------------------