[ expat-Bugs-824420 ] expat-2003-10-15 - something is broken or at least changed

"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.text.xml.expat.bugs
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Bugs item #824420, was opened at 2003-10-15 17:40
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kwaclaw
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=110127&aid=824420&group_id=10127

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Rolf Ade (pointsman)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: expat-2003-10-15 - something is broken or at least changed

Initial Comment:


(.. err, sorry for steppin' in late, again :-( )

I compiled my expat based project with expat-2003-10-15
and run my test suite. 

For at least some rare cases, there seems to be
something broken. I haven't any deep insights, so far,
but since I can't spend much more time at it this night
and in face of the upcomming release, I decided to just
yell, only with an example.

Please download the document
http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-xslt-19991116.xml

If I run 'xmlwf REC-xslt-19991116.xml' I get

REC-xslt-19991116.xml:396:0: unbound prefix

This seems wrong to me in two ways. 

First, without the -n option, xmlwf shouldn't care at
all, if a prefix isn't bound to a namespace. At least
xmlwf 1.95.6 (and prior versions) didn't care (and I
would say, this was right). 

And second, as far as I can tell, the claim itself is
false; there is a xmlns:e namespace declaration in
scope of that element. 

I stumbled over the problem while using the lib and
then tried to reproduce the problem with xmlwf, for
easy demonstration. So, if there is a problem, it's not
with the xmlwf tool, but with the lib itself.

rolf




----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Karl Waclawek (kwaclaw)
Date: 2003-10-15 20:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=290026

Please try the attached fix: prefix_patch.diff.

The (old) code was processing prefixes even if namespaces
were turned off. Hopefully the changes don't break anything
else. Would be nice if you could run it through the test-suite.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=110127&aid=824420&group_id=10127
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.