Re: best practice to "XMLify" binary data

"Stefan Momma" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.text.xml.expat.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> From: Karl Waclawek <[email protected]>
> To: Stefan Momma <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Expat-discuss] best practice to "XMLify" binary data
> Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 16:26:59 -0400
> 
> Stefan Momma wrote:
> > We have the following situation:
> >
> > XML documents are generated by an application, and sometimes there are
> > binary characters embedded somewhere inside a CDATA section of the
> > document
> > which are not valid UTF-8.
> > These XML data are parsed using expat in a different application.
> >
> > Is there a "best practice" what to do as the final step in the XML
> > generation process to manipulate the data such that they do not end up
> > with
> > invalid token errors for this material inside CDATA? We want to retain
> > as
> > much as possible of the original data, so some kind of replacement
> > representation would be helpful. Which tools can you recommend for that
> > task?
> >
> >   
> Use base64 encoding.
> 

If I want to keep the valid data human readable, and just
protect/encapsulate/encode the invalid parts, what would be the best tool to
achieve that? I found ICU's uconv, which has a substitute option, and will
test that. Any other options?

-s. 


-- 
-- stefan momma
-- johannesstrasse 7 
-- 70794 filderstadt-bernhausen
-- [email protected]

Echte DSL-Flatrate dauerhaft für 0,- Euro*!
"Feel free" mit GMX DSL! http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl

_______________________________________________
Expat-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.libexpat.org/mailman/listinfo/expat-discuss
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.