Re: Expat and Open Watcom

Michael Greene wrote:
> Karl Waclawek wrote:
>> Michael Greene wrote:
>>> Thanks for the reply. I am not an expat/xml expert, do you mean run 
>>> this:
>>>
>>> xmlwf -p i18n.xml
>>>
>>> I get nothing so I expect it is ok?
>>
>> It would indicate that in the test code, the actual call to the 
>> parsing function did not return an error.
>> So something else went wrong. Something could be wrong with memory 
>> allocations, as you
>> get out of memory errors. Hard to diagnose from here - and I don't 
>> know anything about Open Watcom.
>>
>> Karl
>
> Thanks for the all the responses, but it seems in that I was missing 
> the XML_DTD define. Now runtests.exe completes 100%. I still need to 
> track the errors with the XML_TEST_SUITE.
>
>
Not all errors are errors (I mean mostly those that say "Output 
differs", but also others).
Some are simply a result of xmlwf having a different definition of 
canonical XML
than the current standard. There is an open bug (#569461) where the XML 
test suite is discussed.
Also the code running the test suite isn't ideal - it doesn't process 
the XML file that describes
the test cases, but processes them based on the directory structure, 
which is not 100% correct.

Overall, Expat is close to 100% compliant.

Karl