Re: XML_SetHashSalt(p, 0) semantics
Fred Drake <[email protected]> Mon, 14 May 2012 16:01:21 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.expat.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAFT4OTFrZ8Z3B_Q7yx2e_9BfPx=9p3EvojkO4c4aHsK+K+oM4g@mail.gmail.com> |
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Karl Waclawek <[email protected]> wrote: > One could also say that it is a good thing that test cases are forced to = be fixed.... Definitely. +1 to fixing the documentation. Relying on the order of entries in a hash is a really bad thing, and they shouldn't be difficult to fix. Whatever sentinel value is used, it should be provided as a #define. I don't expect it to really matter whether it's 0 or 0xFFFFFFFF, but changing it would be an API breakage at this point. -Fred -- = Fred L. Drake, Jr.=A0 =A0 <fdrake at acm.org> "A person who won't read has no advantage over one who can't read." =A0=A0 --Samuel Langhorne Clemens