Re: keep-together question

Hi,

from my POV, integer value seems to behave as 'auto' does. That sounds
like a bug.

Please, can you file in a bug entry on JIRA, attaching your modified
FO, resulting PDF, and if possible, expected result.


2016-02-25 19:12 GMT+01:00 Matthew R. Wilson <[email protected]>:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 09:41:20AM +0100, Pascal Sancho wrote:
>> That can be achieved using an integer value rather than 'always'.
>> See [1] (compliance page) & [2] (XSL-FO rec v1.1) for further info.
>>
>> NOTE: keep-together should be considered as a shorthand for
>> *.within-line, *.within-column, and *.within-page
>
> I've tried using an integer value, but that doesn't seem to do anything.
> For example, changing my original example attachment to the following
> snippet
>
>   <fo:block keep-together.within-page="100">
>     <fo:block>line 1</fo:block>
>     <fo:block>line 2</fo:block>
>     <!-- ... more ... -->
>     <fo:block>line n</fo:block>
>   </fo:block>
>
> does not do what I expect. Even though this block can fit on a page, I
> don't end up with a page break before it and it just breaks in the
> middle. The same block with keep-together.within-page="always" results
> in the expected page break before the block. I've removed all other
> keeps in the document so there shouldn't be anything conflicting with
> the attempt to make this block appear on its own page.
>
> The FOP compliance page says that there is "Minimal support for
> <integer> values", but I don't see anything explaining further. So I'm
> back to not knowing if I'm just not doing it right (i.e. is there
> something more to it than changing "always" to "100"), or am I hitting a
> scenario that isn't supported by the minimal support.
>
> Thanks,
> Matthew
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>



-- 
pascal