Re: Fail hard on missing images

Are you saying I need to create my own fop runner to do such a thing? It
can't be done using the regular fop script?

Seems like an unfortunate design choice. Or maybe I'm missing something...
I always thought the fop script was the primary method of using fop, but
perhaps I'm wrong.

/Oskar



2016-05-26 14:10 GMT+01:00 Jeremias Maerki <[email protected]>:

> See http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/2.1/events.html for an example of
> exactly that.
>
> HTH
> Jeremias Maerki
>
>
> On 12.05.2016 23:12:22 Oskar Berggren wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > Sometimes a document will reference an image that FOP is unable to find.
> With FOP 2.0, it will print a SEVERE log and then continue processing the
> file, eventually exiting with a regular zero exit code.
> >
> >
> > Because there may be a significant amount of other logs, and because
> this FOP was invoked from a makefile that renders a bunch of documents,
> it's easy to miss the log about the missing image. And because FOP appears
> to not use a non-zero exit code, the make command will also not complain.
> >
> >
> > How can I make FOP scream louder on missing images (and perhaps also
> other errors)? It could complete processing the file, but crucially I would
> like it to exit with a non-zero exit code so that make will stop with an
> error message.
> >
> >
> >
> > /Oskar
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>