Re: Javascript mime type
Sjur Moshagen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.forrest.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Den 24. jan 2013 kl. 22:33 skrev Tim Williams: > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Tim Williams <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Sjur Moshagen <[email protected]> wrote: >>> According to this page: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4101394/javascript-mime-type >>> and many others on the net, application/javascript is the correct answer, but not accepted by MS IE ≤ 8. Which leaves us with text/javascript. But several places (including the above) argues that leaving it empty is fine, and the most compatible. I have no strong opinions, though, just that the present mime type definitely is wrong :) >> >> I'd go with text/javascript - it's a reasonable default. Agrre, I'll commit. >> It's worth >> noting that we serve it as 'application/javascript' because that's the >> default mime-type mapping for httpd[1]. > > Ooops.. dangling pronoun:( "we" == forrest.apache.org :) :) Sjur