Re: [VOTE]: motion to transform Xerces into a top-level project as a member of the "federation" of XML projects
Glen Mazza <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Incidentally, the Batik team has been kind of quiet lately--Batik-Dev and Batik-User emails haven't been getting responded to by Thomas or Vincent for some time now. Thomas has been silent for about a month [1]--actually a concern for me, as this is quite unusual--and it appears that Vincent doesn't subscribe to the Batik lists anymore [2]--at any rate, emails that would appear to motivate a response are not getting answered. [3]. The formation of an XML Graphics TLP may allow us to provide more support to Batik when needed, thankfully, we have a growing group of committers on FOP. Glen [1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?a=105474001700005&r=1&w=2 [2] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?a=98865026700007&r=1&w=2 [3] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=batik-users&m=108316069024280&w=2 Berin Lautenbach wrote: > Any thoughts - not just from Xerces, but others as well? We have one > month to the board meeting where we need to say what we are doing in > this space. > > We either need to make this happen (and thus recognise that > Xerces/Xalan/etc are already acting as TLPs), or we need to look at > how the XML PMC is going to more effectively oversite the "sub-projects". > > I *really* don't want to head down the latter path, as it means the > XML PMC is going to have to start getting involved in code changes and > releases for all the sub-projects. > > Cheers, > Berin > > Berin Lautenbach wrote: >