Re: Batik and FOP - how to proceed
Berin Lautenbach <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Glen Mazza wrote: > Jeremias, the Batik project has been ignoring FOP's > emails on this topic for so long that I think it's > time that we give this up. My efforts on this issue > were second only to yours, but at this stage I'm not > that interested anymore in working with that project. > I wish them well. Then go with a FOP project and integrate Batik if and when it makes sense :>. > > In the meantime, the decisions made by the Xerces and > Xalan teams will decide whether or not the XML PMC > will remain or be disbanded. (Perhaps best for FOP > not to influence this one way or the other, but just a > guess on my part here.) Once it's determined that the > latter will actually occur, I am very much looking > forward to our new FOP TLP. Until then, things are > also fine working under the XML PMC. The XML PMC will probably remain - but only as a holder for commons (+ potentially Batik) and anything else that comes up (potentially also as a kick start for new XML ideas). I suspect we are also going to need some people to look after web sites etc. I think it will be much cut down. Having said that - I *really* want to move this along, so I'd encourage you guys to make the break :>. Cheers, Berin