Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 Sources to Apache
Geir Magnusson Jr. <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.general,gmane.text.xml.xalan.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Apr 6, 2005, at 5:25 PM, Brian Minchau wrote: > My understanding is that Sun is signing a CCLA for their contribution > of > JAXP 1.3. yes. it's really a software grant, in effect. > > I presume that like any code, the JAXP 1.3 code will have bugs, and > will > develop over time, and will need fixes by someone. In the short term > that > would most likely be Sun employees. As a Xalan PMC member it is my > responsibility to verify the pedigree of contributions before accepting > changes into the code base. > > Are individual people listed in the CCLA that Sun is signing? No. > If so, then > how can I find out who is listed, so that I can feel more confident > about > accepting further contributions. Looking at > http://www.apache.org/licenses/cla-corporate.txt I don't think that > individuals are listed. yes, there's a bit of a mess there (need to fix the site). Sun signed the same CCLA that IBM signed for Derby, which is a CCLA and simultaneous grant. So they are using it for the grant part. > > Also, in the past there seems to be some code that was contributed to > Apache by Sun employees who were committers, but who have never signed > a > CLA. I think that at that time CCLAs did not exist. So I find the > phrase in > the CCLA most interesting: > "Your "Contributions" means all of your past, present and future > contributions ..." > >> From reading that CCLA form it looks like all past, present and future > contributions of all Sun employees have their licensing rights given > to the > ASF, unless the contributions were donated with "Not a contribution" or > some other conspicuous, but similar phrase. If this is true then I > feel > better about past contributions by people who were Sun employees at > that > time, and who have never signed a CLA. There are no people listed. I'll be happy to fax you a copy if that helps. IBM legal has the document - it's the same that they used for Derby and the recent JSR-105 contribution. geir > > > - Brian > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > Brian Minchau > Apache Xalan PMC Member > e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > Shane Curcuru > <shane_curcuru@ya > hoo.com> > To > [email protected] > 03/31/2005 12:18 > cc > PM [email protected], > [email protected], > Eduardo Pelegri-Llopart > Please respond to > <[email protected]>, > general Jeff Suttor > <[email protected]>, > [email protected], > [email protected], > [email protected] > > Subject > Re: Donation of JAXP 1.3 > Sources to > Apache > > > > > > > > > > > Excellent news! Thank to Sun folk and Geir for picking up the ball on > this one. > > Note: once the papers are in the Hallowed Halls, I presume that Neeraj > will get some consensus from xml-commons, xalan-dev, and xerces-j-dev > as > to how to actually check this in? I'm presuming you have someone with > commit access to xml-commons, which is the pre-existing home for JAXP. > (Although incubator should check the legal issues, I don't think the > code needs to checkin thru there). > > But I know Xerces and Xalan may have specific dependencies on > xml-commons code, so we probably need to branch to allow current > versions to work as-is and let them plan new versions with 1.3 support. > > - Shane > > Neeraj Bajaj wrote: >> xml-common, xerces & xalan communities, >> >> I have learnt that legal issues regarding donation has been resolved >> and >> latest version of CCLA has been signed. >> So would like to make the actual code grant of JAXP 1.3 APIs + >> implementation ASAP. I will start the preparation >> today and will be back with actual code grant with in 2 days. >> >> >> Best Regards, >> >> - Neeraj > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > -- Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437 [email protected]