Re: Noticed performance degrade from lucene-7.5.0 to lucene-8.0.0
Uwe Schindler <[email protected]> Sun, 14 Apr 2019 14:56:58 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.jakarta.lucene.user,gmane.text.xml.general,gmane.text.xml.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
------314557PPFEKLIVDQMSRP8P70DEBBYH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Without further information we can't help here=2E So we would need the type= of queries (conjunction, disjunction, phrase,=2E=2E=2E)=2E There are signi= ficant changes which may cause some queries to be slower, but others like 5= 0 times faster if the exact number of results are not needed, see https://w= ww=2Eelastic=2Eco/blog/faster-retrieval-of-top-hits-in-elasticsearch-with-b= lock-max-wand Uwe Am April 14, 2019 2:22:59 PM UTC schrieb Khurram Shehzad <khurramx@outlook= =2Ecom>: >Hi All, > >I have recently updated from lucene-7=2E5=2E0 to lucene-8=2E0=2E0=2E But = I >noticed considerable performance degrade=2E Queries that used to be >executed in 18 to 24 milliseconds now taking 74 to 110 milliseconds=2E > >Any suggestion please? > >Regards, >Khurram -- Uwe Schindler Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen https://www=2Ethetaphi=2Ede ------314557PPFEKLIVDQMSRP8P70DEBBYH--