Re: Noticed performance degrade from lucene-7.5.0 to lucene-8.0.0

Uwe Schindler <[email protected]> Sun, 14 Apr 2019 14:56:58 +0000
Newsgroups gmane.comp.jakarta.lucene.user,gmane.text.xml.general,gmane.text.xml.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
------314557PPFEKLIVDQMSRP8P70DEBBYH
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Without further information we can't help here=2E So we would need the type=
 of queries (conjunction, disjunction, phrase,=2E=2E=2E)=2E There are signi=
ficant changes which may cause some queries to be slower, but others like 5=
0 times faster if the exact number of results are not needed, see https://w=
ww=2Eelastic=2Eco/blog/faster-retrieval-of-top-hits-in-elasticsearch-with-b=
lock-max-wand

Uwe

Am April 14, 2019 2:22:59 PM UTC schrieb Khurram Shehzad <khurramx@outlook=
=2Ecom>:
>Hi All,
>
>I have recently updated from lucene-7=2E5=2E0 to lucene-8=2E0=2E0=2E But =
I
>noticed considerable performance degrade=2E Queries that used to be
>executed in 18 to 24 milliseconds now taking 74 to 110 milliseconds=2E
>
>Any suggestion please?
>
>Regards,
>Khurram

--
Uwe Schindler
Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen
https://www=2Ethetaphi=2Ede
------314557PPFEKLIVDQMSRP8P70DEBBYH--