Re: Article by Tim Bray..
<[email protected]> Tue, 18 Mar 2003 13:53:53 +0000 (GMT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.o-xml |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Andy Joslin wrote: > Martin, this surely requires a response? well i did actually -> Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 19:03:38 -0800 From: Tim Bray <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: Re: XML Is Too Hard For Programmers [email protected] wrote: > Tim, hope you don't mind me asking -> > "An XML-Oriented Programing Language? One response has been a suggestion > that we need a language whose semantics and native data model are > optimized for XML. That premise is silly on the face of it".. > > would you say this includes XSL as a programming language, or any other > (turing-complete) transformation language that uses an XML Data Model? I personally dislike XSL; it seems to be finding its proper role as a decent semantics-free syntactic transformation engine. Yes, I'm doubtful of the premise that the way forward is to make the programminy machinery more like the data. -- Cheers, Tim Bray i didn't want to bring up the whole o:XML thing, but i had to disagree with some of his reasoning --> Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 03:18:37 +0000 (GMT) From: [email protected] To: Tim Bray <[email protected]> Subject: Re: XML Is Too Hard For Programmers On Mon, 17 Mar 2003, Tim Bray wrote: > I personally dislike XSL; it seems to be finding its proper role as a > decent semantics-free syntactic transformation engine. Yes, I'm > doubtful of the premise that the way forward is to make the programminy > machinery more like the data. i was just surprised that you go so far as to say that the "premise is silly on the face of it". i personally find XSLT a very useful technology, much thanks to it's natural integration in XML and XPath. coming from the O-O factory, i see no conflict with XML as a data format for oo paradigms either. On the contrary the extensible, hierarchical structure lends itself perfectly to polymorphic models. Which is a lot more than what can be said for relational db's! cheers, /m Martin Klang http://www.o-xml.org - the object-oriented XML programming language