Re: "Converting DTDs (and DTD developers) to RELAX NG schemas" paper

Tim Bray <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.text.xml.relaxng.general
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
On Nov 25, 2003, at 2:49 AM, David Carlisle wrote:

> What is the current feeling amongst Relax MG practitioners, is it OK 
> to use
> the compact syntax as a normative specification of a grammar?

For Atom, I think we're going to use RNC as the "official" schema; we 
may end up also having an official .xsd because the trang-generated 
version is kinda hideous.  Nothing wrong with trang, just the usual XSD 
broken-ness. -Tim
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.