Re: missing start element
Eric van der Vlist <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.relaxng.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | Dyomedea (http://dyomedea.com) |
| Message-ID | <1070054855.1104.3654.camel@delleric> |
On Fri, 2003-11-28 at 22:16, David Tolpin wrote:
> It makes things more clear, thank you. I would still prefer to have RELAX NG schema
> for RELAX NG specifying it.
This is a general problem with RELAX NG: most of the language
restrictions can't be captured by the RNG schema for RNG.
The reason is that most of the restrictions of RNG are expressed on the
schema after simplification while the RNG schema for RNG describes the
schema before simplification.
OTH, I think that's this design decision is one of the reasons for the
level of flexibility of RELAX NG and that's a fair enough price to pay!
Eric
--
Read me on Advogato.
http://advogato.org/person/vdv/
Upcoming XML schema languages tutorials:
- Philadelphia -full day- ( 7/12/2003) http://masl.to/?V28612FC5
- Santa Clara -half day- (15/03/2004) http://masl.to/?J24916E96
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com
(W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema
------------------------------------------------------------------------