Re: implicit grammar
James Clark <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.relaxng.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, 2003-11-29 at 06:13, David Tolpin wrote: > Hi, > > What's the reason behind not allowing implicit grammars in included schemas? They are allowed. Each file in a compact syntax schema is translated individually to XML syntax. Each file is translated the same way whether its the top level file, referenced in include or referenced in external. The compact syntax schema is correct if the requirements of Appendix A of the Compact Syntax spec are met and if the resulting XML syntax schema is correct. James