Re: Converting Relax-NG to Schema and DTD

David Tolpin wrote:

> > What about writing a transformation that will replace difficult 
> constructs with more general ones?
>
>> a&b with (a|b)*, for example?
>  
>

Once one has identified the troublesome part of the schema, sure.
My problem is reading the schema back through 18 levels of indirection
with a wet towel tied around my head, trying to understand what trang means
by "cannot handle this type of choice" in this context.

Sebastian Rahtz