Re: Interleaving optional elements

Tor Helland wrote:
 >>XMLBuddy has no problem with it. Try to validate it with Jing, to 
check if
 >
 > it's simply a validator difference.
 >
 > Awfully sorry, XMLBuddy not to blame, I made a mistake :-(

You had me worried there for a second. I'd be very surprised if XMLBuddy 
allowed anything jing doesn't, since it uses jing for validation! ;-}

Bob Foster
http://xmlbuddy.com/