Re: Documentation tokenization
"Jeff Rafter" <[email protected]> Wed, 28 Apr 2004 13:40:43 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.relaxng.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <02f601c42d61$13f18710$b101a8c0@ARIMATHEA> |
> I have been testing my theories against > XMLDistilled (which is extremely useful) and they are not lining up. I tested against Jing and it seems to pass all documentation that I can throw at it-- even when it seems it should be failing. I suppose I am a little confused as to whether or not: ## Documentation # comment is allowable. From my reading it is not-- but my reading could be wrong. The grammar could be saying that when the # is encountered it is the start of a separator (i.e., a comment) and is therefore the end of the documentation. For that matter, is: # Comment # Comment allowable? Again it seems to me that A.2 says it is not. But Jing and XMLDistilled accept it. > (2) Is step "C" accurate? from documentationLineContent production in A.2 it > seems so. Again, XMLDistilled allows this. I think that this is not accurate. I misread the " " restOfLine option. I believe it was trying to show that in the case of ## Some text That the resulting documentation would be "Some Text" not " Some Text". A single initial space in documentation is discarded. Thanks again, Jeff Rafter