Re: association of RELAX NG with a document
Eric van der Vlist <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.relaxng.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | Dyomedea (http://dyomedea.com) |
| Message-ID | <1066988977.1402.2.camel@porteric> |
Hi James,
On Fri, 2003-10-24 at 03:31, James Clark wrote:
> Right. I believe it's quite wrong for a schema language to dictate that
> a document type designer must use an element name or an attribute for a
> particular purpose (as W3C XML Schema does with xsi:type or
> xsi:schemaLocation). The document type designer should be the one who
> decides what element names and attribute names to use, and the schema
> language should allow the document type designer to write a schema to
> reflect their decision. I think this extends to any association
> mechanism and it also applies to processing instruction target names.
Do you think this should be added to the requirements of DSDL - Part 10
(Validation Management) ?
Eric
--
Read me on XML.com.
http://www.xml.com/pub/au/74
Upcoming schema tutorial:
- Philadelphia (7/12/2003) http://makeashorterlink.com/?V28612FC5
Tutoriel XSLT:
- Paris (25/11/2003) http://makeashorterlink.com/?L2C623FC5
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com
(W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema
------------------------------------------------------------------------