Re: association of RELAX NG with a document

At 13:51 23/10/2003 -0400, John Cowan wrote:
>David Tolpin scripsit:
>
> > In simpler words, the people who designed the
> > technology don't see a consistent way to formally express an
> > association that already exists, or didn't implement it yet.
>
>It's part of the general problem of specifying appropriate XML
>processing; an RNG-specific solution is neither particularly
>general nor, IMHO, particularly useful.
>
> > If I
> > pretend that a document is valid against a RNG schema, how would I
> > formally express it in a standard way?
>
>How about this:
>
><?xml version="1.0"?>
><rdf:RDF

Enough. No thanks John.

regards daveP