Re: "Converting DTDs (and DTD developers) to RELAX NG schemas" paper
John Cowan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.relaxng.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
James Clark scripsit: > 1. You suggest doing RNG validation in addition to DTD validation. So > long as you do RNG DTD-compatibility checking, RNG validation alone is > enough (although I can well imaging non-technical reasons for doing DTD > validation). > > 2. With DTD validation, you can only check that the document is valid > with respect to the DTD that the document specifies. In many cases, > even in a DTD-based environment, there is a requirement that the > document use a specific DTD, but DTD validation provides no way to > enforce this. RNG validation helps with this too. Since DTDs can be used as validation schemas, the true division is between an incorporated DTD and a validation schema rather than between DTD validation and RNG/WXS validation. -- Is a chair finely made tragic or comic? Is the John Cowan portrait of Mona Lisa good if I desire to see [email protected] it? Is the bust of Sir Philip Crampton lyrical, www.ccil.org/~cowan epical or dramatic? If a man hacking in fury www.reutershealth.com at a block of wood make there an image of a cow, is that image a work of art? If not, why not? --Stephen Dedalus