Re: new snapshot (may 11)

hi scott,

> 1052 doesn't really give much information at all.  It just says facelets
> doesn't work, which means that for us to track it down, we would need to
> download facelets, create a test case, figure out how to reproduce it,
> and then track down the actual API that's failing.

hmm, i think this as a complaint about how users should report bugs.

actually, as i'm a programmer, too, i have a different view on the bug-report of
 what is actually reported in 1052.

it doesn't say 'facelets don't work', it says that the META-INF isn't searched
by the classloader for requested files. this is imo as detailed a description
can be.

i'm a bit puzzled by your post. emerging technologies should be looked into by
you from time to time, so you should encounter similar problems yourself. it's
quite strange to me to let your customers report mis-behaviors and then just
scratch the problem on the surface and even don't try to run facelets (which is
really a download/run thing!).

i'm really interested in helping you - but an email asking for more details
would have been more customer oriented then your post.

i will happily provide any information you need, but for a programmer a
description as reported is - imo - reproducable. and since i'm not the
programmer of facelets - what else should i've reported?

best regards, --- jan.