Re: Recommending 3.0.19
"Bill Au" <[email protected]> Tue, 20 Jun 2006 09:27:30 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.resin.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Scott had mentioned that a Resin bug in the HotSwap JNI code triggered the JVM bug. Scott, now that the JVM bug has been fixed in 1.5.0_07, any idea when the Resin bug will be fixed? Bill On 6/20/06, sks <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes Scott has acknowledged it as an issue. I can get around it by stopping > using a datasource and getting a connection to the database using the good > old fashioned java.sql.DriverManager.getConnection but obviously that's > quite inefficient. > > > > > > If the bug really is within Resin, wouldn't everybody using Resin (and > > MySQL Connector/J, if I remember things right) see this problem? > > What is special about your setup? Has anybody been able to reproduce > your > > problem? > > > > At 2006-06-20 11:20, you wrote: > >>Pity the oom error in the datasource isn't fixed yet, causing my servers > >>to crash almost daily. > >> > >>>So it seems to me, until now our production server ist running and > >>>running > >>>and running... > >>>- no more OutOfMemoryError in perm space (the server is generating > >>>permanently new jsp-pages, but the perm space could be cleaned > >>>periodically, > >>>what shows the garbage collection log) > >>>- reliable log rotation > >>>- even no other error > >>> > >>> From our perspective would be given the same recommendation! > >>> > >>>Keep at it! > >>> > >>>Olaf Jentsch > >>> > >>>>-----Original Message----- > >>>>From: Mattias Jiderhamn [mailto:[email protected]] > >>>>Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 10:38 AM > >>>>To: [email protected]; [email protected] > >>>>Subject: Recommending 3.0.19 > >>>> > >>>>At 2006-06-14 19:11, Scott Ferguson wrote: > >>>> >>That seems a lot more like it by the looks of things. Any > >>>>idea on when > >>>> >>3.0.20 is going to be released? > >>>> > > >>>> >Roughly 4-6 weeks. There are still quite a few bugs to work > >>>>through, > >>>> >though, so it might change. > >>>> > >>>>Speaking of this, I must say that after a few weeks with > >>>>3.0.19 in production it seems to be really stable. All the > >>>>bugs we have seen after the upgrade to 3.0.x have been fixed. > >>>> From our perspective, I would recommend anyone using 2.1 and > >>>>considering 3.0 to aim for 3.0.19. > >>>> > >>>>Well done guys! > > > > > > > > >