Why not add name to the scale/array type as struct type?

Because there is no order defined for paramters for the method, when there are more than one parameters required by the invocation, which one of the same type, e.g. int, the only way to let the peer, rpc request processor, know the differences among these parameters is to put the scale type parameter under the "hood" of struct type.

Thus the struct type behaves just as a collection of named scale types  or array types parameters.

I tried to implement the rpc-xml parser and internally I tried to use a tree-like structure, however sometime which seems not efficeint for searching a node/leave without name. Is there any better way to make it?

Thanks a lot!
Maggie



------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/xml-rpc/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/xml-rpc/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/