Re: SAX - endDocument() confusion again
Elliotte Rusty Harold <[email protected]> Fri, 27 Feb 2004 16:45:07 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.sax.devel,gmane.text.xml.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <p06010205bc656a624668@[192.168.254.4]> |
At 2:07 PM -0500 2/27/04, Karl Waclawek wrote: >Since there is no strong and explicit assertion in the SAX docs >that EndDocument *must* always be called, this would indicate to me >that in fact there is no such assertion at all, as this looks >like a proof to the contrary. Taking this argument to extremes, is it acceptable for a parser not to call startDocument? Just to call fatalError? I have caught parsers doing this, especially when the error is very early in the document; e.g. in the byte order mark or the XML declaration. -- Elliotte Rusty Harold [email protected] Effective XML (Addison-Wesley, 2003) http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/effectivexml http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0321150406/ref%3Dnosim/cafeaulaitA ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click _______________________________________________ List: sax-devel, [email protected] See: http://www.saxproject.org/ https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sax-devel