Re: [xml-dev] Re: Showstopper issue with new Attribute text

/ Elliotte Rusty Harold <[email protected]> was heard to say:
| At 9:47 AM -0500 3/17/04, David Megginson wrote:
|
|>a) an attribute with no Namespace URI and the local name "xmlns";
|>
|> b) an attribute with the Namespace URI
|> "http://www.w3.org/2000/xmlns/" and no local name; or
|>
|> c) an attribute with the Namespace URI
|> "http://www.w3.org/2000/xmlns/" and the local name "xmlns".
|>
|> Note that none of these is a clean solution, probably because
|> Namespaces 1.1 is a bit broken.  Then again, I doubt it matters
|> much.  If no one presents a convincing argument, I'll just pick one
|> of the three at random.
|
| Agreed except for picking one at random. I prefer option c when the
| xmlns-uris feature is true; option a when xmlns-uris is false.

That's fine by me.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <[email protected]> | Everything should be made as simple as
http://nwalsh.com/            | possible, but no simpler.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBAYwPwOyltUcwYWjsRAvarAJ4g1e3GlbU28CsISZ3wH+wJ1BsRWQCgo3Fx
PcXAmE+FOKJ55Q7yreDpXMk=
=9F9U
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----