Re: [Repost] Re: [PATCH]: A couple fixes to org/xml/sax/package.html

> Karl Waclawek wrote:
> 
> > I sent this patch before I saw you had committed Michael's patch.
> > Right now CVS is consistent, and the only reason I object to
> > the  use-entity-resolver2  being read/write is that it does not
> > add anything and just gives you one more way to do the same thing,
> > which - IMO - violates the "minimal" principle for API design.
> > 
> > However, I can live with both choices, and leave it up to you to decide.
> > For completeness, the patch to undo Michael's patch which undid my previous
> > patch, is attached. It was not created through CVS, as pserver access to
> > CVS does not go against live data, so I couldn't see your recent changes. 
> 
> Thank you for the patches.  Since there's no serious harm either way,
> however, I'll leave the CVS as it is.

That's fine with me.

In the end, even if a feature is read/write, as long as the feature
itself is optional it can still be implemented as read-only
without seriously violating SAX standards.

Karl


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
_______________________________________________
List: sax-devel, [email protected]
See:  http://www.saxproject.org/
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sax-devel