Re: Passing null to setFooHandler
"Karl Waclawek" <[email protected]> Sun, 25 Apr 2004 14:21:11 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.sax.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <001a01c42af2$1696cb90$0200a8c0@karlglen188> |
> I suggest we add verbiage like the following to each of the setter > methods in XMLReader: > > An application may pass null to this method to remove the currently > registered ContentHandler. In this case, the parser must stop using the > old handler immediately. A NullPointerException is not thrown. Make sense to. Is that really not documented? Karl ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Robotic Monkeys at ThinkGeek For a limited time only, get FREE Ground shipping on all orders of $35 or more. Hurry up and shop folks, this offer expires April 30th! http://www.thinkgeek.com/freeshipping/?cpg=12297 _______________________________________________ List: sax-devel, [email protected] See: http://www.saxproject.org/ https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sax-devel