Re: Build javadoc fix

At 1:40 PM -0400 4/26/04, David Megginson wrote:

>Thanks.  I'm going to postpone this patch until after our release, 
>because I don't want to add a new dependency this late in the 
>process, but it does look like a good idea.


OK, but you might still want to use this in the build file you 
personally use to generate the docs for the public web site. All the 
"java.lang.String"s are just ugly. I don't think anybody is likely to 
think a String object is anything other than a java.lang.String. 
Ditto for InputStream, OutputStream, etc.
-- 

   Elliotte Rusty Harold
   [email protected]
   Effective XML (Addison-Wesley, 2003)
   http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/effectivexml
   http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0321150406/ref%3Dnosim/cafeaulaitA


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Robotic Monkeys at ThinkGeek
For a limited time only, get FREE Ground shipping on all orders of $35
or more. Hurry up and shop folks, this offer expires April 30th!
http://www.thinkgeek.com/freeshipping/?cpg=12297
_______________________________________________
List: sax-devel, [email protected]
See:  http://www.saxproject.org/
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sax-devel