Re: qualified name argument to startElement

Mikael StÃ¥ldal <[email protected]> Wed, 28 Apr 2004 09:46:55 +0200 (CEST)
Newsgroups gmane.text.xml.sax.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:

> You would not have to do this. You would just pass the local name for each
> argument. That is you'd pass the same String object twice in the method call.
> A qualified name is *not* a prefixed name, though the SAX docs are misleading
> on this point, and we should probably fix that too.

What *is* a qualified name then? And where is that specified?


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. 
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. 
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click
_______________________________________________
List: sax-devel, [email protected]
See:  http://www.saxproject.org/
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sax-devel