Re: Extension interfaces in SAX dot NET?

At 2:11 PM -0400 6/13/04, Karl Waclawek wrote:

>What would you then say about moving ILexicalHandler and
>IDeclHandler into the core as well, or in other words,
>eliminating the notion of core vs. extensions?

The problem with doing that is that it requires parsers to support 
these extensions. If you're comfortable with that, OK, but it is 
extra work for impleenters, especially at first. There's also an 
extent to which these provide content that applications really 
shouldn't rely on or use in a major way.
-- 

   Elliotte Rusty Harold
   [email protected]
   Effective XML (Addison-Wesley, 2003)
   http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/effectivexml
   http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0321150406/ref%3Dnosim/cafeaulaitA


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X.
From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the
one installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and
evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504
_______________________________________________
List: sax-devel, [email protected]
See:  http://www.saxproject.org/
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sax-devel