Docs back under control (was Re: Another doc issue)

On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 07:37:34 -0500, Elliotte Harold
<[email protected]> wrote:

> OK. I looked at it again and there is a conflict. On
> http://sax.sourceforge.net/?selected=namespaces we find

[snip\

> I think these sentences in
> http://sax.sourceforge.net/?selected=namespaces should simply be
> deleted. I don't think they're reliable or accurate. The empty string
> could mean namespace processing is not being performed, or it could mean
> the namespace URI is the empty string. I suspect at one point in the
> past. somebody was planning on the empty string only being used when
> namespace processing is performed but this is not the case now.

Done -- I have finally figured out how to get at the web site and have
made a few minor updates (including adding the latest JavaDoc).  I
know there's a lot more to do, and will be grateful for help.  There's
a little PHP in there, unfortunately, but I don't see an easy way of
getting rid of it without breaking links (and I did enough of that
when I first moved the site from megginson.com).


Thanks, and all the best,


David

-- 
http://www.megginson.com/


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
List: sax-devel, [email protected]
See:  http://www.saxproject.org/
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sax-devel