Re: Should I use sax?

Mikael St=E5ldal <[email protected]> wrote on 05/23/2006 04:47:36 PM:

> Michael Glavassevich wrote:
> > If you're writing new code, I would avoid using Xerces' native=20
> > serializers. They are non-standard, not particularly well maintained=20
and=20
> > likely to be deprecated [1] soon (perhaps in the next release). JAXP's =


> > TransformerHandler [2] is a much better choice for serializing SAX=20
events.
>=20
> The serialization code in JAXP is from Xalan (the XSLT processor). It=20
> has some problems and gives different results in Java 1.4 and 1.5 in=20
> some cases.

JAXP is an API. I think you mean the Sun implementation which contains a=20
fork of Apache Xalan. The latest version of Xalan may have fixed some of=20
the bugs you found or never had them to begin with.

Thanks.

Michael Glavassevich
XML Parser Development
IBM Toronto Lab
E-mail: [email protected]
E-mail: [email protected]



-------------------------------------------------------
All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk!
Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in
the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=107521&bid=248729&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
List: sax-devel, [email protected]
See:  http://www.saxproject.org/
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sax-devel