Re: setEntityResolver(null)

> 
> OK, you're right, I'm wrong.
> 
> That either means that I'm stupid or the docs need quite a bit of 
> clarification (or both ;-).

Well, it may help you to know that originally I thought that
the default behaviour was to not resolve the entity at all,
and then this thread forced me to read the docs more carefully ... ;)

Personally I believe that entity resolving is not a parser's job.
From a programmer's view I think that separation of concerns
is a good principle and should apply here too. In other words,
there should not be any built-in entity resolving, but rather some
separate default implementation, just the way you thought it worked.

Karl



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: 
Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! 
No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
List: sax-devel, [email protected]
See:  http://www.saxproject.org/
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sax-devel