Re: Use of QName forcing declaration "Unused" namespaces
Ihe Onwuka <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.saxon.help,gmane.text.xml.xsl.general.mulberrytech |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CALfs7+zDKJQ+WgfPGyt=A+Xdg+udwpo_K=mD9MK4wAgqgKWbUw@mail.gmail.com> |
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 2:26 AM Michael Kay <mike-JkSD5nQpfvpWk0Htik3J/[email protected]> wrote: > Well, passing lexical QNames across interfaces is definitely a bad idea > unless you can be sure that both sides of the interface know the namespace > context (that is, the set of prefix-URI bindings). Without a namespace > context, a lexical QName is meaningless. > > Well actually I'm just schema hacking. As you know some things in a schema are namespace qualified and some things aren't so I thought using the xpath naming functions would more expressive of what I was doing. _______________________________________________ saxon-help mailing list archived at http://saxon.markmail.org/ [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/saxon-help