Re: SOAP2.3.1 on Tomcat 5

Daniel Zhang <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.text.xml.soap.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Jeff -

As it claimed, tomcat 5 has improvements on tomcat 4.1 in many ways. 
Also it implemented the Servlet 2.4 and JSP2.0 instead of tomcat 4.1 
implementation of Servlet 2.3 and JSP 1.2. See detail at 
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/index.html.

However, since SOAP 2.3.1 was released almost 2 years ago when tomcat 5 
was not born. My concern is whether SOAP 2.3.1 works better with tomcat 
5 or with old tomcat 4.1.x versions. There might be compatibility 
problems. On the other hand, I may take a look at AXIS vs. tomcat 5.

One feature we use SOAP 2.3.1 is its messageing services(we call remote 
messagerouter instead of rpcrouter). I don't know if AXIS still keep 
this feature or not.

-Daniel





JEFF EMMINGER wrote:

>Daniel,
>
>I'm very new to SOAP and have only developed a few small services, but
>they're all running on Tomcat 5.
>
>-Jeff
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Daniel Zhang [mailto:[email protected]] 
>Sent: Friday, 19 Mar, 2004 8:39 AM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: SOAP2.3.1 on Tomcat 5
>
>
>We are running SOAP 2.3.1 on Tomcat 4.1.27 right now. But we are 
>worrying about performance issues. Heard that tomcat 5 has better 
>performance. Has anyone had the experience running SOAP 2.3.1 on tomcat 5?
>
>TIA,
>
>-Daniel
>
>
>
>
>CONFIDENTIAL NOTICE: This email including any attachments, contains 
>confidential information belonging to the sender. It may also be 
>privileged or otherwise protected by work product immunity or other 
>legal rules. This information is intended only for the use of the 
>individual or entity named above.  If you are not the intended 
>recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, 
>distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents 
>of this emailed information is strictly prohibited.  If you have 
>received this email in error, please immediately notify us by 
>reply email of the error and then delete this email immediately.
>  
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.