Re: fault listener

Scott,

I don't know if you have read my last message. The point is that I can't
resolve the problem yet.

What I could do, is make a small example that reproduces the problem, and
post the server code, the client code, the deployment descriptor, and the
faults and exceptions messages, that would help?

Thanks very much,

tizo

>-- Mensaje original --
>Reply-To: [email protected]
>From: "Scott Nichol" <[email protected]>
>To: <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: fault listener
>Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 23:59:18 -0400
>
>
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: <[email protected]>
>To: <[email protected]>
>Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 7:55 PM
>Subject: Re: fault listener
>
>
>Scott,
>
>>>>>
>I have tried with the nightly build of Apache SOAP, and there is not more
>exception in the client when I use ExceptionFaultListener, and there is
>a exception in the server
><<<<
>
>What is the stack dump from the server exception?  The nightly build should
>have more useful information in the dump than the 2.3.1 release had.
>
>>>>>
> (is that a bug in the production version?, if
>it is, how could I fix that?)
><<<<
>
>You need to post the stack dump for anyone to determine the nature of the
>problem.
>
>>>>>
>, but I still have a problem:
>
>I have seen the code of ExceptionFaultListener, and it takes the original
>exception, wraps it in a Parameter, puts the Parameter in a Vector, and
>puts the last one in the detail entries of the Fault (with method setDetailEntries).
>In the client side, when I've got a Fault, I get the detail entries Vector
>(with method getDetailEntries), take the first element of this Vector (the
>only one), and it is not of class Parameter; why?, shouldn't it be a Parameter?
>Anyway, this object (the first one of the detail entries Vector) is of
class
>org.apache.crimson.tree.ElementNode2.
><<<<
>
>It will be a Parameter, unless an exception is thrown trying to de-serialize
>a detail as a Parameter, in which case it will be kept as an Element.
>
>Scott Nichol
>
>Do not send e-mail directly to this e-mail address,
>because it is filtered to accept only mail from
>specific mail lists.
>