AW: Compressing SOAP requests and using SSL

Hi Nigel,
I am using soap2.3.1 for RPCs
calling the methods takes as far I remember not very much changes
and it is looking somehting like this:

...
SOAPHTTPConnection st = new SOAPHTTPConnection();
...
SOAPContext ctx = new SOAPContext();
ctx.setGzip(true);
Call call = new Call(m_soapServiceName,
                     callName,
                     params,
                     null,
                     Constants.NS_URI_SOAP_ENC,
                     ctx
                    );
call.setSOAPTransport(st);
...

Butyou also need to enhance the soap depoloy discriptor looking something
like this:

   <isd:provider type="java"
                  scope="Application"
                  methods= "...">
    ...
	<isd:option key="gzip" value="true"/>
    ...
  </isd:provider>


good luck hope it helps

Malte


-----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
Von: Nige White [mailto:[email protected]]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. November 2004 16:22
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: Compressing SOAP requests and using SSL


OK, looking at the soucre code, it looks like I should extend
SOAPHTTPConnection, and override send() using an extended version of
HTTPUtils in which I implement postCompressed().

I already extend SOAPHTTPConnection so that I can share a
SOAPHTTPConnection between several generated client classes (I keep
count of how many disconnect from it, and when there are none left, I
send a shutdown call to the server), so it's not a big deal.

A few things though. I'm trying to use explicit imports (Isn't it bad
style to import "...*"?) The latest source of SOAPHTTPConnection.send()
references a Cookie class. There is no Cookie class in my SOAP which is
2.3.1. There is a Cookie class in the source archives, but it's new.
Which version of SOAPHTTPConnection should I go back to? Or should I
pull out the latest source of Cookie, and use that?

Is this a good approach? I want to keep my client classes simply using
Call.invoke(), so the change must be invisible to that level.

Nigel

PS: Any help on the "No serializer" question I posted? I tagged it onto
the tail end of Vladimir's thread. Thanks!

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses. Virus scanning
powered by Messagelabs http://www.messagelabs.com For more information
e-mail : [email protected]



____________
Virus checked by G DATA AntiVirusKit
Version: AVK 15.0.815 from 03.11.2004
Virus news: www.antiviruslab.com