Re: partitioning rectangles into sub-rectangles -- CSS vs <table>
Oliver Boermans <[email protected]> Sat, 22 Mar 2014 18:59:41 +1030
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.svg.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAC_e8vGOcDqbPiyrses-JMpip-j3za_karx0DbU6uNZ7it1OFQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi David, I haven't looked closely at the problem you are trying to solve, but this might be the CSS3 you are looking for: http://css-tricks.com/snippets/css/a-guide-to-flexbox/ Cheers Ollie On 9 March 2014 03:50, David Dailey <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I've been fiddling with this problem (vaguely related to Euler diagrams) > off and on for a decade or so: > > > > > http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1116/number-of-ways-to-partition-a-rectangle-into-n-sub-rectangles > > > > Now, here is the question for you folks: > > > > We are told that using HTML tables to divide space into geometry is a > terrible non-non, akin, perhaps to fratricide or, at least, fracking. Alas, > colspan and rowspan (curse the folks who invented them!) makes it so > painless (see for example, the little table (a geometric metaphor for the > thought process) at http://cs.sru.edu/~ddailey/Navigability.html) ! Is > there any way nearly so easy to do this with CSS? I was once told that it > was impossible in CSS2, but that CSS3 would make it again possible (though > doubtlessly far more complex). > > > > I know that the subject raises passion in certain communities where > ideology trumps pragmatism, but mathematics is ultimately a purer ideology, > methinks, than web-standards-dogma, whence the question. > > > > Cheers > > David > > > >