Re: partitioning rectangles into sub-rectangles -- CSS vs <table>

Oliver Boermans <[email protected]> Sat, 22 Mar 2014 18:59:41 +1030
Newsgroups gmane.text.xml.svg.devel
Message-ID <CAC_e8vGOcDqbPiyrses-JMpip-j3za_karx0DbU6uNZ7it1OFQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi David,
I haven't looked closely at the problem you are trying to solve, but this
might be the CSS3 you are looking for:
http://css-tricks.com/snippets/css/a-guide-to-flexbox/
Cheers
Ollie


On 9 March 2014 03:50, David Dailey <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> I've been fiddling with this problem (vaguely related to Euler diagrams)
> off and on for a decade or so:
>
>
>
>
> http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1116/number-of-ways-to-partition-a-rectangle-into-n-sub-rectangles
>
>
>
> Now, here is the question for you folks:
>
>
>
> We are told that using HTML tables to divide space into geometry is a
> terrible non-non, akin, perhaps to fratricide or, at least, fracking. Alas,
> colspan and rowspan (curse the folks who invented them!) makes it so
> painless (see for example, the little table (a geometric metaphor for the
> thought process) at http://cs.sru.edu/~ddailey/Navigability.html) ! Is
> there any way nearly so easy to do this with CSS? I was once told that it
> was impossible in CSS2, but that CSS3 would make it again possible (though
> doubtlessly far more complex).
>
>
>
> I know that the subject raises passion in certain communities where
> ideology trumps pragmatism, but mathematics is ultimately a purer ideology,
> methinks, than web-standards-dogma, whence the question.
>
>
>
> Cheers
>
> David
>
>
> 
>