Re: LSSerializer declaring unneeded xmlns:xml

Okay, thanks again Michael.

On 6/21/10 9:52 PM, Michael Glavassevich wrote:
> Hi Chad,
>
> Chad La Joie <[email protected]> wrote on 06/21/2010 08:56:00 PM:
>
>  > Hey Michael, I also meant to ask, while the Xerces serializer is
>  > deprecated, do you happen to know if any significant issuer were found
>  > and fixed in the Xalan-resident code? Just wondering if we'd be trading
>  > on potential problem for one or more known problems.
>
> It's been awhile since I've spent any time looking at either serializer.
>
> For reference there are 26 JIRA issues [1] still open against the Xerces
> serializer. Many haven't been confirmed. Some others wouldn't be
> reachable through an LSSerializer. How that compares to the Xalan
> version when it's used as an LSSerializer I'm not sure.
>
>  > Thanks again.
>  >
>  > On 6/21/10 1:57 PM, Michael Glavassevich wrote:
>  > > If you're in dire straits you could always use Xerces' deprecated
>  > > LSSerializer instead. It will be picked up automatically by Xerces if
>  > > you remove serializer.jar from your classpath. Alternatively you could
>  > > instantiate the old serializer directly:
>  > > Class.forName
>  > ("org.apache.xml.serialize.DOMSerializerImpl").newInstance() and
>  > > cast that to an LSSerializer.
>  >
>  > --
>  > Chad La Joie
>  > http://itumi.biz
>  > trusted identities, delivered
>
> Thanks.
>
> [1]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&pid=10520&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&resolution=-1&component=11114
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&pid=10520&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&resolution=-1&component=11114>
>
> Michael Glavassevich
> XML Parser Development
> IBM Toronto Lab
> E-mail: [email protected]
> E-mail: [email protected]
>

-- 
Chad La Joie
http://itumi.biz
trusted identities, delivered