Re: Prepping a 3.2.4 release
Boris Kolpackov <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xerces-c.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Code Synthesis |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Roger Leigh <[email protected]> writes: > If Xerces-C++ was to be retired, projects will need to consider other > options, be that other libraries, or other languages. What would be the other options for XML Schema validation usable from C++? It's easy to say people should do this and that in the abstract. Given a C++ codebase that needs to parser XML with XML Schema validation, what concrete steps do you propose people take to migrate to something else? And, no, rewriting everything in a different language just because Xerces-C++ has some bugs is not a sensible step. FWIW, I will vote strongly against moving Xerces-C++ to Attic and if that happens we will fork it (we are already half way there[1] anyway). [1] https://github.com/build2-packaging/xerces-c