Re: Xerces not reporting validation errors ?

Gerben Abbink <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.text.xml.xerces-j.user
Message-ID <CALOFD2VeBiHOK6yH5DzG7EcJL7yJFB+fOHEG1KKgui8b=7v1xw@mail.gmail.com>
Hallo Ed,

What makes you think XMLSpy is correct? Element
CommutingExpensesDaysPerWeekCount is defined by:

http://www.xbrl.org/2003/xbrl-instance-2003-12-31.xsd

<attributeGroup name="numericItemAttrs">
    <annotation>
      <documentation>
      Group of attributes for non-fractional numeric items
      </documentation>
    </annotation>
    <attributeGroup ref="xbrli:essentialNumericItemAttrs" />
    <attribute name="precision" type="xbrli:precisionType" use="optional"
/> <-- OPTIONAL!
    <attribute name="decimals" type="xbrli:decimalsType" use="optional"
/> <-- OPTIONAL!
  </attributeGroup>
It seems to me the attributes are indeed optional. Maybe XMLSpy is using a
different version of the XBRL schemas?


- Gerben Abbink
  XMLBlueprint XML Editor
  XMLBlueprint.com


On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Ed Bras <[email protected]> wrote:

> I am validating an XML doc in Java with Xerces, but don't get any errors.
> However, the XML doc contains errors and when I validate it with for
> example
> XMLSply editor, the errors are correctly reported.
> I can't find what I am doing wrong. I think I do include all XSD schemas
> that are required to validate correctly.
>
> Please some advice? The code snippet:
> -----
> SchemaFactory factory =
> SchemaFactory.newInstance(XMLConstants.W3C_XML_SCHEMA_NS_URI);
> factory.setErrorHandler(new ErrorHandlerDefault());
> Schema schema = factory.newSchema(createSchemaSources());
> validator = schema.newValidator().validate("file.xml";
> ----
>
> The XSD's that I use to validate:
> ---------
> private Source[] createSchemaSources() throws IOException {
>  Source[] sources = new Source[5];
>  sources[0] =
> createSource("
> http://www.nltaxonomie.nl/7.0/domein/bd/tuples/bd-bedr-tuples.
> xsd");
>  sources[1] =
> createSource("
> http://www.nltaxonomie.nl/7.0/domein/bd/tuples/bd-bedr-tuples.
> xsd");
>  sources[2] =
> createSource("
> http://www.nltaxonomie.nl/7.0/domein/bd/tuples/bd-burg-tuples.
> xsd");
>  sources[3] =
> createSource("http://www.nltaxonomie.nl/7.0/basis/sbr/types/nl-types.xsd
> ");
>  sources[4] =
> createSource("http://www.xbrl.org/2003/xbrl-instance-2003-12-31.xsd");
> return sources;
> }
> ----------
>
> A small snippet of the xml file being validated (too big to list all):
> ---------
>  <bd-burgers:CommutingExpensesDaysPerWeekCount unitRef="uu_513"
> contextRef="cc_711">2</bd-burgers:CommutingExpensesDaysPerWeekCount>
> ----------
> This entry contains an error, namely:
>   Numeric item <bd-burgers:CommutingExpensesDaysPerWeekCount> has neither a
> 'precision' nor a 'decimals' attribute.
>
> This is correctly reported by XMLSpy but not by my Java code :(... So what
> am I doing wrong here? I though I was forgetting an XSD file, but
> "CommutingExpensesDaysPerWeekCount" is defined in
> "http://www.nltaxonomie.nl/7.0/basis/bd/items/bd-burgers.xsd", that is
> contained int he above xsd's, that corresponds to the type
> "nonNegativeIntegerItemType" contained in
> "http://www.nltaxonomie.nl/7.0/basis/sbr/types/nl-types.xsd", also
> contained
> in the xsd's above, and that extends "monetaryItemType" and is defined in
> "http://www.xbrl.org/2003/xbrl-instance-2003-12-31.xsd", which xsd is also
> contained in the above validation.
>
> Any idea why my Java validation not reports any errors?
>
> BTW: it does report an error if I change the above XML snippet in:
>
> -----
>
>
> <bd-burgers:CommutingExpensesAccordingToTableTotalAmount>841.0</bd-burgers:C
> ommutingExpensesAccordingToTableTotalAmount>
> ----
> That is: removing all attributes. I then get a correct Validation error
> saying that the contextRef is missing.
>
> - Ed
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.