[ xframe-Bugs-978539 ] Some annotations lost
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> Wed, 23 Jun 2004 14:11:31 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.text.xml.xframe.xsddoc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Bugs item #978539, was opened at 2004-06-23 14:11
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=454391&aid=978539&group_id=48863
Category: doc
Group: xsddoc-0.5-beta
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Some annotations lost
Initial Comment:
Hello,
I have a case of annotation/documentation that doesn't
end up into the HTML documentation. But I'm not sure
if it's a bug or not...
Here is a sample case:
<xs:element name="AnElement">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>
This gets into the HTML doc
</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
<xs:complexType>
<xs:attributeGroup ref="aReferenceToAGroup"/>
<xs:attributeGroup ref="aReferenceToAnotherGroup">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:documentation>
<html:br/>
This doesn't end up into the HTML doc
<html:br/>
</xs:documentation>
</xs:annotation>
</xs:attributeGroup>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:element>
What I wanted to do is to provide documentation of a
particular instance of the "aReferenceToAnotherGroup"
within the "AnElement" element. But I'm not even sure
I can do that in the present output format of the HTML
documentation - I have no idea where that could end up!
Thanks,
Di.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=454391&aid=978539&group_id=48863
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 -
digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches,
unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com